Regulation

Priya Kapoor
Priya Kapoor covers property regulation, planning law, and compliance requirements for landlords and developers. She tracks legislative changes so investors can stay ahead of deadlines.

THE PROPERTY FILTER TAKE
The Property Filter Take
• Reform UK's housing spokesperson Simon Dudley has faced calls to resign following comments about Grenfell Tower that were widely condemned as insensitive and dismissive of the tragedy
• For landlords and building owners, this political instability threatens to disrupt the momentum of fire safety compliance that has defined the past five years of regulation
• Consider reviewing your Building Safety Act compliance status now - regardless of which party shapes housing policy, the regulatory deadlines for residential building owners remain firm and non-negotiable
Simon Dudley, Reform UK's newly appointed housing spokesperson, faces mounting calls for dismissal following comments about the Grenfell Tower fire. His remarks - first reported in Inside Housing magazine and covered by Property Wire (April 2026) - have drawn sharp criticism from bereaved families, fire safety organisations, and the Prime Minister. For thousands of residential property owners navigating building safety compliance, his comments raise uncomfortable questions about Reform UK's position on regulation.
Dudley told Inside Housing that whilst Grenfell was "a tragedy" and "a failure," he then stated: "everyone dies in the end. It's just how you go, right?" He subsequently questioned whether building safety regulations introduced after the 2017 disaster were effective, calling them "regulation which is not working" (Property Wire, April 2026). In a follow-up statement, Dudley denied belittling the fire and claimed he had described it as "an utter tragedy."
The remarks sparked immediate backlash. Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the comments "shameful" and called on Reform UK leader Nigel Farage to remove Dudley from his position (Property Wire, April 2026). Grenfell United, the campaign group representing bereaved families and survivors, described the remarks as "insensitive and deeply dehumanising." The Grenfell Next of Kin group called the deaths "gross negligent manslaughter, NOT fate." They rejected outright Dudley's framing that the fire was simply a matter of how people die.
Steve Wright, general secretary of the Fire Brigades Union, called Dudley's comments "disgusting and shocking" (Property Wire, April 2026). A Reform UK spokesperson argued in defence that the regulatory response to Grenfell had "swung too far," suggesting the party believes current building safety rules are excessive.
Dudley, formerly chair of Homes England and the Ebbsfleet Development Corporation, joined Reform UK in February 2026 with the stated aim of bringing technical policy expertise to housing. His appointment appeared designed to provide credibility on housing matters. The political fallout from his Grenfell comments now raises serious questions about whether Reform UK intends to challenge or roll back fire safety regulations that landlords and building owners currently must follow.
For residential building owners in England subject to the Building Safety Act 2022, the immediate implication is uncertainty. That legislation - which created the Building Safety Regulator within the Health and Safety Executive and introduced compliance requirements for high-rise residential buildings - remains the governing framework. However, if Reform UK gains influence over housing policy, the regulatory direction could shift.
The timing is significant. Property owners and managing agents are currently navigating multiple compliance deadlines: EWS1 form requirements for buildings with combustible materials, remediation targets for cladding removal, and the Building Safety Fund applications. These deadlines were set by the previous government and remain in force regardless of political change. However, future regulation - on issues such as retrofit requirements, building control standards, and fire safety enforcement - could be affected by which party shapes housing policy.
The Grenfell Tower fire on 14 June 2017 killed 72 people. The public inquiry established that systematic regulatory failures, combined with use of unsuitable cladding materials, contributed to the tragedy. The regulatory response that followed was significant. Tightened Building Safety Act requirements, the Fire Safety Act 2021, and enhanced building control oversight together represent the biggest restructuring of residential building regulation in a generation.
Reform UK's apparent suggestion that these regulations have "swung too far" represents a challenge to the current regulatory consensus. This matters for investors and building owners because policy direction shapes future compliance costs, inspection regimes, and remediation timelines.
If you own or manage residential buildings in England above seven storeys (approximately 18 metres) or with 50 or more dwellings, keeping your Building Safety Act 2022 compliance programme documented and current is worth prioritising. You may also wish to review your EWS1 (External Wall System assessment) status if your buildings contain combustible materials. Maintaining clear records of all fire safety improvements completed to date puts you in the strongest position regardless of which party eventually shapes housing regulation.
Beyond direct compliance, consider engaging with professional bodies such as the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and the Institute of Fire Engineers. These organisations continue to shape technical standards independently of political cycles. Understanding the technical requirements - rather than waiting for political outcomes - gives you the clearest picture of actual deadlines under current law.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Always consult a qualified professional before making investment decisions.


